Fade out

The white European population seems to be fading out.

2.1 children per couple is needed to maintain the population level, but in Europe the level is under 1.5 and falling. The 1.5 average includes a lot that are European but not white. Many not-white families are having 3/4 children per couple thereby distorting the averages considerably.

If you think the "great replacement theory" is an unmentionable, then the following propositions will make you cringe uncontrollably. Sometimes it pays to explore wild theories. Whatever the case, I do not like to have any subject marked as a taboo subject.

Let's imagine a force or some sort wants to help the European white population fade out. What does this force need to do? A cull is rather obvious and clearly not happening. Instead, all this force needs to do is delay childbirth in as many women as possible. A slow grind, a slow-motion process. Lots of small changes have become evident that delays women from having children.

The more a woman's first conception is delayed, the lower the number of children she will have. If she has her first at 33 years of age rather than 32, she is less likely to have a second and considerably less likely to have three or more. If one could delay the first child by a year the chance of a second is reduced. It is not reduced by a huge amount; it is reduced enough to lower the number of children women give birth to.

Delaying conception in millions of women leads to far fewer children being born. Many thousands fewer. A year's delay can reduce the number from 1.5 per couple to 1.45 per couple.

How do we delay women from having children?

1. Economic forces. The harder things are economically the longer women leave it to have children.

2. Lockdowns. These delayed millions of women from conceiving by about eighteen months.

3. Dating apps. These waste lots of time. Very effective and useful for a certain percentage, but useless and frustrating for the rest.

4. Dissuading people from dating in the workplace.

5. #metoo reducing "in real life" interactions.

6. Reduced prosecutions in relation to sexual violations. Another factor that shifts the needle. Women are less likely to have a child following a violation, delaying many perhaps by a year or so.

7. Silly movements such as 4b. Look it up if you do not know what that is.

I have highlighted seven things that each appear to have moved the needle in the direction of less births per couple. Anything that delays childbirth reduces the population level. A delay in your twenties is less relevant than a delay in your thirties.

I may be mad, conspiratorial but it is a compelling proposition. There is nothing to back up any claim of a force existing that is working towards lowering the number of births. Instead, things such as lockdowns, immigration, economic woes, feminism activism etc have had a deleterious unintentional effect on child birthing rates. We may be experiencing a natural balancing phenomenon and in years to come the birth rate recovers. We as Europeans could be victims of our own success. Whatever the case, I hope it has given you some food for thought.

The true message is this; do not be frightened of discussing contentious ideas. That is one core feature of the European system. Discuss, debate, argue but never shy away from seemingly taboo subjects.